Cyberpowerpc TRACER IV GK7MR0R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCyberpowerpc TRACER IV GK7MR0R  (all builds)
MotherboardCyberPowerPC TRACER IV EXTREME 17
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200403
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 17:29
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 133
2-Core 266
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 712
73% 588 Pts
64-Core 712
44% 712 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1097) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4253
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Lighting 103
Reflection 105
Parallax 91.6
84% 99.8 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 85.2
Splatting 71.7
70% 87.9 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX8100NP 512GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 850 562 891 713 777 688 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2,499
Write 640
Mixed 948
SusWrite 747
265% 1,208 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 67
220% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,085
DQ Write 640
DQ Mixed 1,034
724% 920 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 253%
Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 23.4
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 26.6
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TRACER IV GK7MR0R Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc TRACER IV GK7MR0R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback