| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | Samsung 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z |
| Memory | 0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120420 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | May 30 '20 at 16:52 |
| Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 65% |
PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-2350M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
|
55.3%
Above average
|
55% 84.5 Pts
|
19% 142 Pts
|
9% 151 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C606) 786MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3062
|
1.95%
Terrible
|
2% 2.27 fps
|
2% 2.74 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
30% 40.8 MB/s
|
105% 0.6 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston ACR128X64D3S1333C9 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
42.2%
Average
|
44% 15.5 GB/s
|
18% 6.43 GB/s
|
57% 70.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z Builds (Compare 221 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 55x |
| Core i3-2350MIntelBench 47%, 24,896 samples | 39x |
| Pentium B950IntelBench 43%, 7,305 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 48% - Average | Total price: $253 |