Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E734

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E734  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB26F
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 12:14
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 155
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 166
25% 180 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 17AA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.37% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 6.77
Parallax 6.09
1% 4.74 fps
MRender 6.71
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 7.78
5% 5.65 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.37%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-00004 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0200Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 467
Write 136
Mixed 148
54% 250 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 19
96% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 62
84% 158 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-186.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 18.2
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK E734 Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E734

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $264
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback