Kelyx KL9120

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemKelyx KL9120  (all builds)
MotherboardKELYX EN_SR218_EMMC_V1.0
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191104
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 06:25
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-9120e RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
32% Below average
Memory 55.1
1-Core 38.5
2-Core 51.2
33% 48.3 Pts
4-Core 53.5
8-Core 56.3
7% 54.9 Pts
64-Core 58.1
4% 58.1 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Device(2782 1100) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 19.10.30
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 4.19
Parallax 2.75
2% 2.91 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 1.87
Splatting 3.57
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 256GB SSD 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 149 184 216 232 237 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 386
Write 230
Mixed 213
SusWrite 199
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 15.7
56% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 33.3
49% 92 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 151%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 3 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.3% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback