Asrock B450M Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Gaming  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '20 at 19:09
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 86
1-Core 112
2-Core 223
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 655
68% 547 Pts
64-Core 886
55% 886 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Gigabyte(1458 3FC9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.9% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 113
Parallax 116
91% 113 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 96.4
Splatting 80.2
82% 104 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1210A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 4.8 21 1.7 4.7 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 503
Write 281
Mixed 328
SusWrite 39.5
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 0.3
93% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 71.9
DQ Write 6.2
DQ Mixed 0.4
10% 26.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 101%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 156 157 158 159 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 182
Write 168
Mixed 103
SusWrite 157
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 0.6
12% 4.57 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 1
2% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 23%
Seagate Game Drive PS4 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 113 115 115 122 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 103
Write 120
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 118
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 69%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 256GB
176GB free, PID 0cd1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 302
Write 162
Mixed 190
255% 218 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 8.6
805% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 9.8
784% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$59
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 34.7
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 39.4
SC Mixed 28.3
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Gaming Builds (Compare 626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback