Gigabyte GA-MA74GMT-S2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA74GMT-S2  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '20 at 14:06
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 635
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 42
2-Core 85.4
44% 67.7 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 170
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5500
PwrHis(1787 8336) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.26% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8.69
Parallax 6.06
6% 7.48 fps
MRender 8.14
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 9
6% 7.44 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 80GB (2007)-$46
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 52 54 59 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 65.1
Write 61.3
Mixed 43
SusWrite 51.2
41% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 49%
Seagate ST340017A 40GB
25GB free
Firmware: 3.31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 30 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 26.1
Write 28.4
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 29.2
19% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
21.8% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.4
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA74GMT-S2 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA74GMT-S2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback