Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime16.6 Days
Run DateMay 29 '20 at 12:28
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Memory 35.2
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 61.6
26% 43.2 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 151
16% 129 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Gainward(10B0 0FC1) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.8% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 6.27
Parallax 6.91
6% 6.93 fps
MRender 8.67
Gravity 9.87
Splatting 10.3
8% 9.63 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.8%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 1X2 Mirror/RAID1 119GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 88 82 112 128 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.4% Below average
Read 40.3
Write 21.8
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 90.2
31% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
79% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 152%
AMD 1X2 Mirror/RAID1 500GB
127GB free
Firmware: 1.10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 890
Write 27.1
Mixed 43.1
230% 320 MB/s
4K Read 112
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.4
4,835% 38 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.4% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 226
18% 226 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback