Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E4C-A0TMX
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131101
Uptime	37.9 Days
Run Date	May 29 '20 at 03:30
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	57%
CPU Throttled	50%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70 34,445 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Memory 48.6 1-Core 15.4 2-Core 32.5 23% 32.2 Pts	4-Core 63.9 8-Core 72.6 9% 68.2 Pts	64-Core 64.5 4% 64.5 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C652) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.1% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3.15 Parallax 1.72 2% 2.39 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 4.57 3% 2.91 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.1% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 250GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 50 22 16 22 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 10 Write 6 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 29 12% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 32% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 59%
Multiple Card Reader 4GB 846 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 6.5 6.5 7 6.7 6.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	5.76% Terrible	Read 14 Write 4.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 6.5 8% 7.38 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 58% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.76% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 12 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 3.6 12% 4.33 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	348x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	152x
Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples	93x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	502x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	247x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	200x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 1x4GBAdataBench 30%, 1,080 samples	71x
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	24x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16