Asus X550CC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus X550CC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550CC
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '20 at 23:14
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2365M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 36.5
2-Core 61.5
38% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 94.1
8-Core 93.1
13% 93.6 Pts
64-Core 93.8
6% 93.8 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720M
Asus(1043 21FA) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8857
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 1.72
4% 3.84 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 5.83
Splatting 6.3
4% 5.32 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.85%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX300-120 120GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 93 76 69 70 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 441
Write 348
Mixed 316
SusWrite 96.4
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 20.1
79% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 182
148% 211 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0 Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.6% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 14.4
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550CC Builds (Compare 929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550CC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback