Dell Precision M4800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision M4800  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0PMFT3
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140502
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '20 at 21:19
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 190
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 496
50% 403 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2100M
Dell(1028 05CC) 2GB
CLim: 666 MHz, MLim: 752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 361.75
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 6.75
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 5.47
Splatting 6.17
5% 6.58 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000UM000-1EK164 1TB
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DEP3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 39 68 77 92 110 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 68%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
867GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 82 82 81 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 123
Write 110
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 81.6
121% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ81UG8EFU0-GN-F 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 19.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M4800 Builds (Compare 2,511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M4800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback