Asus P6T

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P6T (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100921
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 27 '20 at 21:05
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 90 1-Core 70 2-Core 140 62% 100 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 345 36% 290 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 14,881 User benchmarks, average bench 7% XFX(1682 2600) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	7.47% Terrible	Lighting 10.2 Reflection 9.85 Parallax 3.47 8% 7.84 fps	MRender 7.62 Gravity 7.7 Splatting 6.35 6% 7.22 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.47% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 213GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 214 214 209 213 213 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	69% Good	Read 256 Write 245 Mixed 240 SusWrite 211 54% 238 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 36.4 118% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 41.4 74% 146 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 56GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 215 215 216 217 215 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	68.6% Good	Read 252 Write 243 Mixed 233 SusWrite 214 53% 235 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 49.8 4K Mixed 36.1 118% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 42.1 73% 141 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 124%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 160 159 160 159 161 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 6 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 9.4 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	570x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	145x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	72x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	78x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	51x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	34x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	224x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	124x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	103x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $318

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16