EVGA NF77-HDMI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNVIDIA MCP73
MotherboardEVGA NF77-HDMI  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '20 at 17:54
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2200-$54
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 25.1
2-Core 50.4
36% 49.6 Pts
4-Core 49.1
8-Core 50.5
7% 49.8 Pts
64-Core 43.7
3% 43.7 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7150 / nForce 630i
Nvidia(10DE CB73) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.17.11.9713
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.07% Terrible
Lighting 0.13
Reflection 0.23
Parallax 0.09
0% 0.15 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.07%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$20
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 58.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 66 69 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 71.3
Write 69.7
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 68.4
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 59%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 64GB-$10
51GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 30.9
Mixed 28.2
33% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.4
89% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 94
42% 94 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NF77-HDMI Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: EVGA NF77-HDMI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $264
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback