Acer Veriton S4610G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton S4610G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton S4610G
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1862 x 1048 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110720
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 27 '20 at 00:25
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 177
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 345
39% 307 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
Zotac(19DA 2103) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 4.69
Parallax 1.81
4% 3.9 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 3.09
3% 3.82 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.12
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 354
Write 257
Mixed 237
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 19
86% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 33.5
DQ Write 65.4
DQ Mixed 11.9
20% 36.9 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
415GB free
Firmware: HP73
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 133
Write 72.4
Mixed 53.1
64% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
Seagate ST9160314AS 160GB
147GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 60.2
Write 64
Mixed 31.2
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton S4610G Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton S4610G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback