Asus P7H55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7H55  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 22:38
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 94.1
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 152
68% 110 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 372
42% 332 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Asus(1043 0511) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 21.2
14% 22.8 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 34.1
22% 26.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 190 190 191 191 190 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.2% Below average
Read 208
Write 186
Mixed 146
SusWrite 189
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 7.1
60% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 85.4
DQ Mixed 8.6
20% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 86%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
235GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 106 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
61% Good
Read 106
Write 113
Mixed 66
SusWrite 106
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61%
Great: 77%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
524GB free
Firmware: 0127
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 18.2
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 28.8
19% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 12.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55 Builds (Compare 312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback