QUO Z77MX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQUO Z77MX  (all builds)
MotherboardQUO Z77MX-QUO-AOS
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130727
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 20:18
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 194
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 454
49% 387 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Asus(1043 0483) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 2.19
Parallax 1.91
2% 2.08 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 1.53
Splatting 1.74
1% 1.65 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 89 93 87 91 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 390
Write 162
Mixed 267
SusWrite 95.6
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 35.4
123% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 137
148% 251 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 118%
OEM Ext Hard Disk 127GB
88GB free, PID 0071
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 172 171 172 171 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
134% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 169
Mixed 142
SusWrite 171
222% 163 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 14.4
1,296% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 12.3
DQ Write 33.8
DQ Mixed 16.5
1,756% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 134%
Great: 140%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77MX Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: QUO Z77MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback