Sapphire WS-F2A85XM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardSapphire WS-F2A85XM  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120712
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 17:47
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FirePro A320 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 130
57% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 206
27% 205 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 375A) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 4.84
4% 4.75 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.17
4% 5.44 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 101 80 83 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 398
Write 234
Mixed 290
SusWrite 121
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 29.3
121% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 175
149% 217 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMY16GX3M2C1866C10 CMY16GX3M2C1866C10 16GB
667, 667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.7% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 10.2
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback