MSI Z97 GAMING 7 (MS-7916)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7916
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 7 (MS-7916)  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 14:07
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 94.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 390
54% 398 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.2% Good
Lighting 79.4
Reflection 83.2
Parallax 73.5
65% 78.7 fps
MRender 78.7
Gravity 68
Splatting 65.5
57% 70.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 53 1.1 68 55 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 376
Write 302
Mixed 279
SusWrite 69.7
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 23
114% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 42
66% 126 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
154GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 81.2
Write 81.7
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 87.5
57% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 84%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
668GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 180 179 181 180 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 150
Mixed 106
SusWrite 179
115% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
93GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 88 89 92 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
53% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 88.5
Mixed 58
SusWrite 90.6
61% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
100GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 103 104 103 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 110
Write 111
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 103
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
12GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 35.3
Mixed 32
SusWrite 36.4
26% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 63%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
703GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 86
Write 71.5
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 80.5
98% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.8
276% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMY8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 0215 CMY8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
63.3% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 20
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 57.9
69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 GAMING 7 (MS-7916) Builds (Compare 1,365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 7 (MS-7916) - $203

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $851
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback