Asrock A75M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A75M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 04:12
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 46.7
2-Core 94.3
48% 73.9 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 183
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
ASRock(1849 9640) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Lighting 5.37
Reflection 5.88
Parallax 4.72
4% 5.32 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 5.43
4% 4.69 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 289 281 296 294 265 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 362
Write 283
Mixed 172
SusWrite 281
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 20.8
77% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 52.9
DQ Mixed 25.5
23% 33.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.9% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.8
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A75M-HVS Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A75M-HVS - $238

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback