HP Laptop 17-ca0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 17-ca0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84D2
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 18:20
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 36.2
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 147
45% 85.1 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 289
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 6 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84D2) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.08.04
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.88
Parallax 5.53
4% 5.27 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 6.91
4% 5.29 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 480GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 346 336 209 144 100 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.8% Below average
Read 260
Write 106
Mixed 89.1
SusWrite 240
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 7.5
33% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 16.7
DQ Write 17.3
DQ Mixed 14.8
12% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 12.9
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 12
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 221
18% 221 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 17-ca0xxx Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 17-ca0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback