Lenovo 20236

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20236  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131119
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 17:26
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 47.2
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 119
46% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 50.3
8-Core 46.3
7% 48.3 Pts
64-Core 45.1
3% 45.1 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3800) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 2.72
3% 3.98 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.43
4% 4.79 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 13 60 82 89 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 93
Write 91.5
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 67.2
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170EB68F9W1600 Kingston 99U5469-070.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
26.7% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 10.5
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20236 Builds (Compare 956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20236

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback