TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion WE136AA-UUZ p6337ch

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHp-pavilion WE136AA-UUZ p6337ch  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI IONA
Memory0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100128
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 10:58
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 142
57% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 202
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 51%
 Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
MSI(1462 1603) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 6.12
Parallax 2.5
3% 4.19 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 3.23
Splatting 4.91
3% 3.92 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.26%
 Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
866GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 16 30 32 38 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 152
Write 131
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 28.8
66% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 52%
 Great: 107%
Disco virtuale Microsoft 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 3 6.6 8.4 6 3.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.4% Average
Read 142
Write 119
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 5.7
53% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 42.4%
 Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HP497157-C01-ELDW 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 13.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 31%
 Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback