Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Memory 21 1-Core 31.7 2-Core 58.6 21% 37.1 Pts	4-Core 85.3 8-Core 86.1 11% 85.7 Pts	64-Core 86.8 5% 86.8 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.88% Terrible	Lighting 0.77 Reflection 0.73 Parallax 0.81 1% 0.77 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 2.52 1% 1.56 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.88% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180S3128GJ 128GB 4,961 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 79 70 49 60 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 389 Write 248 Mixed 59 SusWrite 69.8 42% 192 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 19.8 51% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 110 82% 110 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1.5GB 1,884 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 7 21% 7.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 313 13% 313 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	7x
Celeron J3455IntelBench 26%, 375 samples	4x
Celeron J3455EIntelBench 26%, 47 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	15x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	2x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	2x

SSD
128GB SSD 128GBForeseeBench 59%, 2,750 samples	13x
RBUSNS8180S3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 68%, 456 samples	2x
256GB SSD 256GBForeseeBench 79%, 1,745 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x1.5GBABCDBench 24%, 1,884 samples	19x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16