PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P5K SE (all builds) |
Memory | 0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20090625 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | May 24 '20 at 17:50 |
Run Duration | 168 Seconds |
Run User | GRC-User |
Background CPU | 50% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
|
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Gigabyte(1458 3536) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1025 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
6.18%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 25 39 40 60 66 MB/s
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
Intenso Speed Line 8GB
3GB free, PID 0916
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 7.2 7.9 6.6 6.5 7.7 MB/s
|
4.36%
Terrible
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB
2GB free, PID 1d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 MB/s
|
0.35%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 37x |
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $20Bench 37%, 11,349 samples | 17x |
Core2 Duo E8200Intel $12Bench 40%, 4,318 samples | 13x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 9x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |