Asus P5K SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5K SE  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090625
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 24 '20 at 17:50
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Memory 50.5
1-Core 25.2
2-Core 38.4
27% 38 Pts
4-Core 47.7
8-Core 53
7% 50.3 Pts
64-Core 56.5
4% 56.5 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Gigabyte(1458 3536) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1025 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 7.34
4% 7.57 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 14.8
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 25 39 40 60 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 66.6
Write 65.8
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 40.2
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 70%
Intenso Speed Line 8GB
3GB free, PID 0916
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 7.2 7.9 6.6 6.5 7.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Read 15.8
Write 6.3
Mixed 7
SusWrite 6.9
11% 9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
14% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 13%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB
2GB free, PID 1d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
0.35% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.8
1% 0.62 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.35%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.13 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4.5
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K SE Builds (Compare 210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback