Asus P5Q SE PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5Q SE PLUS  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '20 at 12:00
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 42.9
2-Core 72.6
40% 61 Pts
4-Core 77.8
8-Core 81
11% 79.4 Pts
64-Core 78.8
5% 78.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
Sapphire(174B E142) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
4.79% Terrible
Lighting 6.13
Reflection 7
Parallax 5.06
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.33
Splatting 5.83
4% 5.29 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.79%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 72 76 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 209
Write 117
Mixed 150
SusWrite 76.9
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 19.8
88% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 53.2
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 98.2
72% 91.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 73%
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$66
277GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 71 67 71 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 76.1
Write 75.4
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 70.2
44% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
19.4% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q SE PLUS Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q SE PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback