Biostar H81A

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Biostar H81A (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140616
Uptime	8.2 Days
Run Date	May 24 '20 at 10:24
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 86 2-Core 211 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 376 52% 387 Pts	64-Core 403 25% 403 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.16 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Lighting 15.6 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 19.2 13% 16.4 fps	MRender 21.1 Gravity 18.7 Splatting 16.8 15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 256GB-$100 4,989 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231600 SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 306 280 312 341 315 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 444 Write 360 Mixed 206 SusWrite 314 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 78.1 4K Mixed 29.8 124% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 124 131% 218 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 350GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 160 169 176 175 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 161 Mixed 32.6 SusWrite 170 96% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GB 7,464 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61% Good	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 18.4 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 19.2 53% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81A Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H81A

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	14x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	12x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
T253X6256G 256GBTeamBench 70%, 941 samples	3x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x

RAM
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 53%, 7,464 samples	6x
Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 52%, 16,472 samples	4x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $333

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16