| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Dell Latitude E6410 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 04373Y |
| Memory | 2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100708 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 24 '20 at 04:35 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
39.6%
Below average
|
43% 70.7 Pts
|
17% 124 Pts
|
8% 133 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Dell(1028 040A) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2281
|
0.67%
Terrible
|
0% 0.89 fps
|
1% 1.05 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S350
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 165 155 162 175 185 MB/s
|
30.6%
Below average
|
31% 137 MB/s
|
30% 10.1 MB/s
|
83% 126 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB
13GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.4 6.8 6.8 7.4 7.4 MB/s
|
9.44%
Terrible
|
10% 9.2 MB/s
|
125% 1.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22%
Poor
|
22% 7.83 GB/s
|
13% 4.63 GB/s
|
29% 137 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Latitude E6410 Builds (Compare 413 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Latitude E6410
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 M 520Intel $70Bench 40%, 23,644 samples | 101x |
| Core i7 M 620IntelBench 42%, 9,076 samples | 86x |
| Core i5 M 560Intel $65Bench 41%, 10,722 samples | 81x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| NVS 3100MNvidiaBench 1%, 9,073 samples | 396x |
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 16x |
| GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 48% - Average | Total price: $98 |