Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121008
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 23 '20 at 22:58
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 377
53% 389 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 81%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.5% Average
Lighting 55.5
Reflection 55.3
Parallax 64.8
45% 58.6 fps
MRender 58.2
Gravity 53.1
Splatting 48.7
43% 53.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 69 69 123 21 109 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.3% Poor
Read 144
Write 77.9
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 84.7
21% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 8.9
36% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 8.7
DQ Write 14
DQ Mixed 10.7
8% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
294GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 91 91 67 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 75.8
Write 55
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 75.4
46% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 89C2 KRE-D3U1600M/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback