Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '20 at 09:43
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1065T
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 56.6
2-Core 115
57% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 337
35% 283 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22ED) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1287 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Lighting 33.7
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 39.5
28% 35.4 fps
MRender 30.6
Gravity 33
Splatting 34
27% 32.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 13 2.2 3.6 3.9 4.2 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.8% Poor
Read 191
Write 87
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 25.1
21% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 9.1
40% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 14.4
11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
370GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 98 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 96.9
Write 91.2
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 96.8
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39% Below average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 13.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.8
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $446
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback