Acer Aspire V5-573G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire V5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_HW
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140416
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateMay 23 '20 at 09:41
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 45.9
2-Core 78.6
46% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 114
16% 116 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
Acer(1025 079B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9882
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
4.78% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 3.23
Parallax 4.06
3% 3.74 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 12.7
8% 9.01 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF128GMCS 128GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FSXAN104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 190 187 234 83 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 393
Write 178
Mixed 176
SusWrite 170
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 28.5
82% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 191
142% 192 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 84%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
43GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 79 85 73 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 55
Write 59.2
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 74.9
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR6A-PB Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 18
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-573G Builds (Compare 304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-573G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $357
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback