Mousecomputer N252LU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.01GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMousecomputer N252LU  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer N252LU
Memory1.8 GB free of 4.00586 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '20 at 04:44
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3160
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Memory 49.7
1-Core 22.4
2-Core 45
27% 39 Pts
4-Core 88.7
8-Core 89.6
12% 89.1 Pts
64-Core 89.4
6% 89.4 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Clevo(1558 0242) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.6% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2.65
Parallax 2.56
1% 2.31 fps
MRender 2.57
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 2.91
2% 2.42 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.6%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC152DS37240GH 240GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 206 144 154 152 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 436
Write 430
Mixed 319
SusWrite 182
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 22.8
77% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 150
121% 171 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC4R1-B1WS MXIC 25L/U Series 42GB
1600, 0 MHz
4096, 38912 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.7% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 6.3
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback