MSI B450M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B84
MotherboardMSI B450M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '20 at 02:29
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 110
62% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 111
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1209 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.7% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 42.9
Parallax 56.4
27% 44.2 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 45.4
Splatting 32.3
26% 30.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 376 394 421 384 372 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 426
Mixed 413
SusWrite 380
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 44.7
149% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 154
116% 156 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 96%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.9% Good
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 21
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 21
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84) Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B450M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback