HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 (all builds)
Motherboard	HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180515
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	May 23 '20 at 02:27
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Opteron X3421 APU 73 User benchmarks, average bench 46% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	49% Average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 63.8 2-Core 112 48% 79.9 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 186 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 51%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7KM480HMHQ-00005 480GB 136 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 406GB free (System drive) Firmware: GXM5004Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 367 364 368 372 367 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Read 406 Write 365 Mixed 340 SusWrite 367 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 79.2 4K Mixed 40.3 136% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 251 DQ Mixed 271 203% 271 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 123%
Marvell Raid VD 8TB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 5TB free Firmware: MV.R00-0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 157 161 107 84 162 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 139 Write 72 Mixed 74 SusWrite 136 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 221%
Marvell Raid VD 2TB 300 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 363GB free Firmware: MV.R00-0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 104 102 102 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 100 Write 98.9 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 101 68% 92.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 199%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 1,197 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 412GB free, PID 0100 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 105 106 106 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 105 Write 105 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 106 117% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GB 211 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.2% Below average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 15.7 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 9 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10

CPU
Opteron X3216 APUAMDBench 30%, 73 samples	4x
Opteron X3421 APUAMDBench 46%, 73 samples	4x
Opteron X3418 APUAMDBench 38%, 13 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	4x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	4x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,679 samples	2x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x
PLUS 120GBSandiskBench 43%, 16,974 samples	1x
MX200 250GBCrucial $134Bench 95%, 26,364 samples	1x

RAM
9ASF1G72AZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 34%, 126 samples	2x
M391A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 119 samples	2x
HMA81GU7CJR8N-VK Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 16GBHynixBench 24%, 3 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $76

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16