Emachines ET1331G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemEmachines ET1331G  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines MCP61PM-GM
Memory1.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090915
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '17 at 19:12
Run Duration519 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 235e
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 39.8
2-Core 73.2
42% 62.5 Pts
4-Core 75.6
8-Core 77
10% 76.3 Pts
64-Core 77.9
5% 77.9 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1300
AMD(1002 2342) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
259GB free
Firmware: 3.CH
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 63.8
Mixed 63.2
48% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.24
72% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 66.8
Write 60.8
Mixed 71.2
50% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.27
74% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 60%
Maxtor 6 L200P0 204GB
147GB free, PID null
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 19.8
Write 13.4
Mixed 16.1
20% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.03
4K Mixed 0.17
110% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
400, 400, 400, 400 MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
26.2% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 9.2
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ET1331G Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines ET1331G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback