Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111116
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateMay 22 '20 at 22:01
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 656
65% 529 Pts
64-Core 768
48% 768 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
POV(1ACC 684B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1603 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 52.7
34% 45.1 fps
MRender 53.3
Gravity 48.3
Splatting 37.2
37% 46.3 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ COLOSSUS-LT 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 174 52 43 41 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 239
Write 220
Mixed 153
SusWrite 93.3
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 15.5
72% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 34.5
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 17.1
15% 22.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38%
Great: 44%
OCZ RevoDrive 3 X2 PCIe 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 300 296 300 303 298 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 600
Write 303
Mixed 313
SusWrite 299
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 30.1
122% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 306
234% 316 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 89%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
397GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 91 90 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 75
Write 96
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 90.6
59% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
267GB free
Firmware: SBM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 105 105 102 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 78
Write 100
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 102
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
140% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 71%
StoreJet Transcend 500GB
459GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 73 74 75 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 75.3
Write 68
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 73.9
85% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 35.9
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,069
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback