Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	51.6% Above average	Memory 77.6 1-Core 80.7 2-Core 136 60% 98 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 150 20% 150 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 21F4) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.91% Terrible	Lighting 4.33 Reflection 5.65 Parallax 2.97 4% 4.32 fps	MRender 4.67 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 0.13 2% 2.41 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.91% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 95 82 134 136 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 420 Write 270 Mixed 295 SusWrite 140 63% 281 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 14.1 58% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 80.4 DQ Mixed 27.3 40% 74.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 56%
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50 5,600 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 226GB free Firmware: GT001H SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 33 33 30 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 38.8 Mixed 27.2 SusWrite 32.3 24% 31.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SH5641G8FJ8NWRNSQG 0194 SH564128FH8NZQNSCG 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.6% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 13.3 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 14.2 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 85.1 47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16