Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512DA
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 22 '20 at 16:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 198
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 534
53% 432 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1821) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 16.1
10% 14 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 16.5
12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1102 512GB
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20180000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 938 742 746 745 597 560 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,208
Write 1,204
Mixed 1,170
SusWrite 721
242% 1,076 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 60.5
196% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 818
DQ Write 449
DQ Mixed 624
467% 630 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 182%
Great: 192%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
157GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 61 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 136
Write 84.2
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 64.2
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.8
218% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
64.8% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 21.2
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22.7
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA Builds (Compare 545 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback