Asus P5Q DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5Q DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '20 at 15:30
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5450-$195
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 86.5
42% 65.7 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 171
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 170
11% 170 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RADEON R5 230
Sapphire(174B A01D) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1003
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.62
1% 0.93 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.39
2% 2.21 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P180
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 13 39 21 15 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.4% Below average
Read 258
Write 6.8
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 19.9
16% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 12.6
54% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 18.2
29% 60.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
902GB free
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 181 173 179 183 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 180
Mixed 94
SusWrite 180
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q DELUXE Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $459
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback