PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds) |
Memory | 8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20101116 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | May 22 '20 at 13:25 |
Run Duration | 2963 Seconds |
Run User | PRT-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$116
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 112 109 110 110 MB/s
|
48.4%
Average
|
|||
Toshiba Q300 120GB
94GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 112 71 89 89 89 MB/s
|
45.7%
Average
|
|||
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
219GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 113 110 111 111 MB/s
|
64.8%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 112 71 89 89 89 MB/s
|
73.7%
Very good
|
|||
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 80 81 80 79 MB/s
|
30.7%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
235GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
|
14%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 500GB
142GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 64 64 64 63 MB/s
|
30.5%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
|
38%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 605x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 292x |
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples | 89x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 116x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 89x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 80x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Above average | Total price: $376 |