HP 455 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 455 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 21E9
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '20 at 08:16
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3330MX APU-$72
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 36
2-Core 73.6
39% 58.7 Pts
4-Core 71.3
8-Core 71.6
10% 71.4 Pts
64-Core 67
4% 67 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6480G
HP(103C 21E9) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
1.69% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 2.85
Parallax 1.84
2% 2.25 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.61
2% 2.02 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.69%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS 545025A7E680 250GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GGEO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 7 5.6 5.7 6.6 7.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
4.47% Terrible
Read 8.9
Write 7.9
Mixed 7.3
SusWrite 6.7
6% 7.7 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.47%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6EFR8A-PB 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB 0h DDR3 1334 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
20.4% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 5.8
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 0.5
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 455 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP 455 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback