Lenovo 81W5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 81W5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '20 at 04:46
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 135
2-Core 278
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 729
72% 589 Pts
64-Core 729
45% 729 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 381C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.40.03.02
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 16.4
10% 15.6 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 22.1
14% 16.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ512HALU-000L2 512GB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1190 971 351 357 332 342 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,342
Write 1,205
Mixed 970
SusWrite 591
230% 1,027 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 67.9
210% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 909
DQ Write 967
DQ Mixed 925
700% 934 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 198%
Great: 202%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN Micron 4471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.5% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 23.6
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 13.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81W5 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81W5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback