Samsung 900X5N

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Samsung 900X5N (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NT900X5N-K58W
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161219
Uptime	16.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '17 at 03:50
Run Duration	88 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	92%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 98.5 2-Core 192 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 274 37% 274 Pts	64-Core 274 17% 274 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Sanyo(144D C149) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4565 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	2.86% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 4.38 Parallax 2.88 2% 3.42 fps	MRender 3.95 Gravity 2.53 Splatting 6.26 4% 4.25 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.86% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB70K1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	210% Outstanding	Read 2,523 Write 876 Mixed 1,115 328% 1,505 MB/s	4K Read 53.2 4K Write 91.1 4K Mixed 34.7 173% 59.7 MB/s	DQ Read 60.8 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 34.7 43% 74.5 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 210% Great: 236%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB 2x4GB 1,688 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	67.9% Good	MC Read 24 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 20.9 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 21 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 900X5N Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X5N

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	8x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	5x
Core i3-7100UIntelBench 43%, 37,239 samples	1x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	13x
940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 36,213 samples	2x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	7x
MZVLW512HMJP-000 512GBSamsungBench 180%, 146 samples	2x
MZVLW128HEGR-000 128GBSamsungBench 166%, 199 samples	1x

RAM
M471A5244BB0-CPB 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,688 samples	12x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 66%, 14,350 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16