Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '17 at 22:18
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 121
57% 90.9 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 172
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
Asus(1043 84F2) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 3.75
3% 3.81 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 3.27
Splatting 5.22
4% 4.21 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
137GB free
Firmware: CP100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 58.6
Write 65.7
Mixed 64.8
48% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.32
76% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST3300622AS 300GB-$130
148GB free
Firmware: 3.AAH Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 58.3
Mixed 41.7
40% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.35
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 37%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
788GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 27
Write 25.2
Mixed 24.1
32% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.25
70% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 63%
Samsung Flash Drive 16GB
10GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
9.37% Terrible
Read 27
Write 9.51
Mixed 13.1
18% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.85
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.77
67% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.37%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 29%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $152
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback