MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '20 at 12:50
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 78
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 442
59% 442 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 39
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 38.9
32% 36.2 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 35.4
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS1 20G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 6.1 27 133 73 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 487
Write 290
Mixed 266
SusWrite 84.9
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 20.1
83% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 77.1
DQ Mixed 16.9
34% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 54%
SMI B16A 120GB
35GB free
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 51 53 53 64 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 501
Write 434
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 101
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 26.2
88% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 1
52% 122 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 71%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
449GB free
Firmware: JE3OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 78 76 77 76 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 80.5
Write 77.3
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 75.8
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R744G2606U1S 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 33.6
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 27.1
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback