Asrock X99 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '20 at 23:00
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 234
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 715
69% 568 Pts
64-Core 925
57% 925 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 149
Parallax 124
107% 135 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 131
Splatting 112
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 838 656 658 610 391 384 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,750
Write 1,342
Mixed 697
SusWrite 590
243% 1,095 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 52.5
189% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 921
DQ Write 760
DQ Mixed 764
593% 815 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 202%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
187GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 471 467 464 464 464 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 467
Mixed 403
SusWrite 467
103% 455 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 56.8
194% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
SanDisk Wireless Drive 256GB
190GB free, PID 557f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.6 7.6 7.5 7.6 7.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.8% Very poor
Read 16.7
Write 7.5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 7.5
13% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 3.4
208% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
77% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 25.1
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 22.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Taichi Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $438
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback