Asus P7P55-M

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55-M (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100331
Uptime	4.5 Days
Run Date	May 20 '20 at 21:57
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 80.3 2-Core 161 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 315 42% 315 Pts	64-Core 304 19% 304 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	54% Above average	Lighting 67.1 Reflection 67.1 Parallax 91.7 55% 75.3 fps	MRender 69.9 Gravity 67.9 Splatting 57.7 53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 61 68 69 54 15 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41% Average	Read 228 Write 181 Mixed 158 SusWrite 53.3 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 46.6 4K Mixed 24.4 86% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22.7 DQ Write 56.2 DQ Mixed 28.2 25% 35.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 100%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2GB free Firmware: SC13 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 60.3 Write 56 Mixed 40 39% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 60%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 305GB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 71 70 54 15 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 100 Write 92.8 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 57.8 55% 74.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 60%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21 168,449 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 83GB free Firmware: 0001SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 69 69 69 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 71.8 Write 71.3 Mixed 40 SusWrite 68.6 46% 62.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 8.9 27% 9.33 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 9.6 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 61.9 65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55-M Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7P55-M

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	66x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	52x
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	39x

GPU
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	19x
BX500 240GBCrucial $27Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	10x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	87x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	69x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48