Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	41.4% Average	Memory 74.8 1-Core 27.1 2-Core 51.8 37% 51.2 Pts	4-Core 50.7 8-Core 50.7 7% 50.7 Pts	64-Core 51.8 3% 51.8 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 8521) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	34.9% Below average	Lighting 44.8 Reflection 44.8 Parallax 40.3 36% 43.3 fps	MRender 40.3 Gravity 39.9 Splatting 37.1 32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 36%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$81 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 815GB free (System drive) Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 108 112 120 91 100 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 124 Write 122 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 105 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BDF0-AE-F 2x2GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.4% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 5.1 16% 5.57 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 90.7 44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 37%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E7600Intel $191Bench 40%, 4,159 samples	6x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	5x
Xeon E5430IntelBench 48%, 1,961 samples	4x

GPU
G45/G43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 1%, 6,554 samples	11x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBSamsungBench 46%, 9,651 samples	3x
Kingston Kingston 8GBHitachiBench 21%, 3 samples	3x
2x2GBApacerBench 19%, 50 samples	2x

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $219