HP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 69% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2162
Memory10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '20 at 17:41
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 20%
CPU Throttled 69%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 87
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 103
56% 86.4 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 178
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 31GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 1.4 1.4 2.8 3.1 1.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 5
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 2.1
9% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 39%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
0GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 1.5 1.8 3.2 3.2 2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.28% Terrible
Read 29.6
Write 2.5
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 2.3
10% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.1
58% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.28%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 16
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 14 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback