Gigabyte GA-E2500N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-E2500N  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '20 at 15:03
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-2500 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Memory 32.9
1-Core 19.1
2-Core 40
20% 30.7 Pts
4-Core 39.2
8-Core 38.4
5% 38.8 Pts
64-Core 38.2
2% 38.2 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8240
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.12
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.31% Terrible
Lighting 1.47
Reflection 3.12
Parallax 1.78
1% 2.12 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 2.26
2% 1.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.31%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 82 67 49 79 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 362
Write 267
Mixed 204
SusWrite 96.8
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 13.7
53% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 89.2
DQ Write 75.8
DQ Mixed 42.4
43% 69.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-493.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 5
13% 4.43 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 4.3
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 238
17% 238 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-E2500N Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-E2500N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback