HP Compaq dc7700p Small Form Factor

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq dc7700p Small Form Factor  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A54h
Memory5.8 GB free of 7.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '20 at 20:44
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6600-$90
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 27.1
2-Core 54.9
37% 52.3 Pts
4-Core 54.6
8-Core 55
7% 54.8 Pts
64-Core 55.1
3% 55.1 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 847B) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 2.04
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725016A9A364 160GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PCBOC72E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 61 55 63 68 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 69.4
Write 35.7
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 61.5
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 44%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
18GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 15 16 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.93% Terrible
Read 20.4
Write 7.7
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 15.4
16% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.93%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 40GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 1024, 33792 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 5
16% 5.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc7700p Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc7700p Small Form Factor

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback