HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory2.5 GB free of 4.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '20 at 18:13
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3520-$230
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 138
60% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 350
38% 298 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Asus(1043 0356) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.3% Terrible
Lighting 7.73
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 6.09
6% 7.53 fps
MRender 8.29
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 9.13
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.06A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 80 91 95 93 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 147
Write 176
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 87.2
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.6
317% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
466GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 86 92 95 94 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 89.3
Write 30.3
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 89.9
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4F1 38GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 34816 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.2
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback